F-Droid Devs

134 Members
#fdroid-dev F-Droid development discussion only | Use #fdroid:f-droid.org for general, app- and repo-related matters | Meetings: https://gitlab.com/fdroid/wiki/-/wikis/Weekly-Office-Hours | This channel is publicly logged at https://matrix.f-droid.org/alias/%23fdroid-dev:f-droid.org27 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
29 Sep 2022
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp(I would love to have that true by default but for that we need https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidserver/-/merge_requests/111714:09:30
@uniq:matrix.orguniq (he/they)
In reply to @rdfg77:kde.org
Do you mean that it should work without the whole fdroiddata repo but only a single recipe?
Yes, e.g. when used used for nightly builds
14:11:37
@uniq:matrix.orguniq (he/they)or 3rd party repos, like NewPipe14:11:57
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspbut if some nightly repo decides that a mal14:12:21
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp..a malicious signature is fine than we should not block it in the fdroid nightly build14:12:44
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp that's exactly my point with that fdroidserver should be data agnostic 14:13:16
@_oftc_Licaon_Kter[xmpp]:matrix.orgLicaon_Kter[xmpp] > scan_binary is false by default 14:13:54
@_oftc_Licaon_Kter[xmpp]:matrix.orgLicaon_Kter[xmpp]For now...14:13:54
@uniq:matrix.orguniq (he/they)fdroidserver has not been data agnosic for the last 10 years14:14:10
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp yes, and I think that's something we need to change 14:14:31
@uniq:matrix.orguniq (he/they)at least the fdroid scanner part14:14:34
@uniq:matrix.orguniq (he/they)no14:14:38
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp (don't get me wrong, I'm all for disallowing all those blobs but only for fdroiddata not for everyone using it) 14:14:58
@_oftc_Licaon_Kter[xmpp]:matrix.orgLicaon_Kter[xmpp] What's with the () jochensp ? 14:15:40
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp (that's a meta comment ;) ) 14:16:18
@_oftc_Licaon_Kter[xmpp]:matrix.orgLicaon_Kter[xmpp]Pfft14:16:43
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspI think tooling (= fdroidserver) is good if it enables you to do things, not if it restricts you14:17:35
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspfor example moving the category definitions from fdroidclient to fdroiddata allows other repos to define their one categories, like Izzy did14:18:14
@uniq:matrix.orguniq (he/they)nobody is disputing that ...14:19:09
@uniq:matrix.orguniq (he/they)this is about defaults for me, not about restrictions14:19:29
@uniq:matrix.orguniq (he/they)the defaults should be fdroids policies14:19:36
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspyes, but we should define policies in data not in the tools14:20:00
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspif we encode them in our tools, we enforce those policies upon everyone14:21:12
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspso people will not use them or find ways around14:21:29
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspto give an example with Debian: all tooling is agnostic to what data you package, if you download stuff from the internet or just shovel existing binaries into the .deb14:22:36
@uniq:matrix.orguniq (he/they) I'm not sure what you're suggesting. Shipping fdroid scan without default data? 14:22:48
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspbut the Debian project has clear policies on all of them14:22:49
@_oftc_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspyes14:22:55
@uniq:matrix.orguniq (he/they)data in the sense of scanner signatures14:22:59
@rdfg77:kde.orglinsui
In reply to @uniq:matrix.org
Yes, e.g. when used used for nightly builds
The fdroiddata are not designed to be used as that. E.g. you still need those srclibs...
14:23:40

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6