| 20 May 2022 |
![@_oftc_Licaon_Kter[xmpp]:matrix.org](./avatar/Licaon_Kter%5Bxmpp%5D) Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | Wanted 940, it upgraded to 942 | 11:59:54 |
 grote | ah ok, what's the dep tree for 9.5.2 then? | 12:01:02 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | Scroll up :) | 12:01:17 |
| grote | so the same as without exclude? | 12:03:09 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | I forgot to look at the deps with the exclude :( | 12:05:07 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | I went straight to apk, then delta, so the vm was cleaned up | 12:05:49 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | Will look after the current delta build | 12:05:58 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | grote: | 13:40:49 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | > so the same as without exclude? | 13:40:49 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | Yes, rather odd | 13:40:49 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | a diff of gradle deps with and w/o exclude shows no change. | 13:44:07 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | Hope the Element devs can dive in | 13:44:56 |
| grote | they might want different dep declarations for their two flavors and only use the exclude on the fdroid flavor | 13:46:13 |
| grote | but on the other hand they probably don't need location on their maps. I didn't even know they had maps. | 13:46:45 |
| grote | _hc: is there a way to let Gitlab Pages use a different docker image to publish non-ruby/jekyll content? I am asking for fdroid library docs | 13:52:44 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | grote: | 13:54:45 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | > they might want different dep declarations for their two flavors and only use the exclude on the fdroid flavor | 13:54:45 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | It's only one line of `implementation` there's no per flavor | 13:54:45 |
| grote | In reply to @_oftc_Licaon_Kter[xmpp]:matrix.org
It's only one line of `implementation` there's no per flavor but there could be | 13:55:03 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | You mean that "they can do it"? Yes, of course, and they might mvbe forced to if it can't be excluded | 13:56:13 |
| grote | In reply to @grote:matrix.org
_hc: is there a way to let Gitlab Pages use a different docker image to publish non-ruby/jekyll content? I am asking for fdroid library docs It always seems to force the ruby image, so I can't use java to generate the html docs :( | 13:59:26 |
| grote | Ah so the issue is that it doesn't accept image: under pages: but it respects the top-level image (which we don't use). | 14:02:39 |
 _hc | In reply to @festplattenschnitzel:matrix.org
Great to hear. I worked on Basebox packaging, which is obsolete now, so yeah :) we're still using VirtualBox and Vagrant baseboxes, we just use the debian basebox now, with a custom build. | 14:03:28 |
| grote | API docs for download library: https://grote.gitlab.io/fdroidclient/download/ | 14:32:52 |
| grote | API docs for index library: https://grote.gitlab.io/fdroidclient/index/ | 14:33:19 |
| grote | Comes with dark theme and search. | 14:34:41 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | This might yield a scanner false positive? | 15:07:12 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | `const-string v0, "com.google.android.gms.org.conscrypt.SSLParametersImpl"` | 15:07:12 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | It's the only mention, seen it twice today, on older from before the binary-scanner CI builds | 15:07:44 |
| Licaon_Kter[xmpp] | To be clear, did not see it in the CI but in the disassembled APK. Maybe I missremembered and the scanner looks up /com/google/... Instead of com.google... | 15:10:44 |
