F-Droid Devs

103 Members
F-Droid development discussion only | Use #fdroid:f-droid.org for general, app- and repo-related matters | Meeting every Thursday at 11:30 UTC | This channel is publicly logged at https://matrix.f-droid.org/alias/%23fdroid-dev:f-droid.org 19 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
26 Nov 2019
@bubu:bubu1.euBubu:-/20:10:05
@mathijs:matrix.vgorcum.comMathijsprobably, but I'm not on the IRC side23:38:48
28 Nov 2019
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas fyi: The F-Droid website seems to be stuck at 2 weeks old versions. 12:33:28
@bubu:bubu1.euBubu
In reply to @andreas:schildbach.de
fyi: The F-Droid website seems to be stuck at 2 weeks old versions.
F-Droid 2019-11-2
12:46:31
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuand search.f-droid.org is from today12:47:20
@bubu:bubu1.euBubu * and search.f-droid.org is also updating correctlyit seems12:47:37
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas Bubu But then why is Bitcoin Wallet still at 7.27? 7.31 has been merged on Nov 14 and afaik it has built the night after. 13:49:12
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas 7.34 has not been posted either (merged Nov 17). 13:49:49
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas Might be related: https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/de.schildbach.wallet is months old. 13:51:12
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas Whereas https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/de.schildbach.wallet/lastbuild redirects correctly to the current version. 13:52:42
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas Öffi draws a similar picture, which is why I assumed the entire F-Droid page is stale. 13:54:09
@bubu:bubu1.euBubu
In reply to@andreas:schildbach.de
Might be related: https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/de.schildbach.wallet is months old.
Wiki not updating is a known problem.
13:54:30
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuAndreas: the client doesn't have anything newer than .27 either13:57:06
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuThe problem seems to be in publishing again.13:57:17
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp joined the room.13:58:25
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp Andreas: the lastbuild is from some hours ago, so maybe wait for the next push? 13:58:26
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuMaybe. It should have updated before though :-/13:59:58
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas jochensp No it built 2 weeks ago as I said. Nov 14 14:04:47
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas Guess F-Droid repeats all the builds each night until it is posted on the website 14:05:19
@bubu:bubu1.euBubu
In reply to@andreas:schildbach.de
Guess F-Droid repeats all the builds each night until it is posted on the website
No, only if it didn't build/verify/sign successfully.
14:06:02
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas Well: Build succeeded 14:06:17
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp Andreas: but it build again today 14:06:28
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas Yes it builds every night 14:06:39
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas Until it is posted 14:06:43
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp anyone if android:versionCode="0x200" is valid? fdroid doesn't detect it. Found here: https://github.com/Wilm0r/giggity/blob/master/app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml#L2 14:07:58
@bubu:bubu1.euBubujochensp: why...?14:09:21
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp fdroid doesn't detect version 2.0 of giggity 14:09:38
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas jochensp According to Android Studio, yes. 14:09:47
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp then it's a bug in fdroidserver, agreed? 14:10:09
@andreas:schildbach.deAndreas jochensp Well I didn't find any docs about this. The XML resources are badly documented in general, and I wouldn't be surprised if AndroidManifest.xml has undocumented stuff too. 14:15:02

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 1