F-Droid Devs

116 Members
F-Droid development discussion only | Use #fdroid:f-droid.org for general, app- and repo-related matters | Meeting every Thursday at 11:30 UTC | This channel is publicly logged at https://view.matrix.org/alias/%23fdroid-dev:f-droid.org22 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
6 Aug 2020
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcI wanted to bring up the topic of the opencollective money12:09:51
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcwe've had it for a while now, it seems we should spend some of it12:10:10
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcI think licaon-kter needs money, and has been doing a lot on fdroiddata. maybe we could work out some kind of payment scheme for fdroiddata work12:10:56
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp I'm fine with supporting F-Droid contributors with money but I would not agree with a direct payment scheme (cf. Debians experience with such sings) 12:23:37
@eighthave:matrix.org_hchow so?12:24:46
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcwhat do you propose instead?12:24:58
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp_hc: referring to the Debian dunk tank story12:37:36
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspnot sure about a better way, the ELTS and Freexian schemes seem to work12:41:16
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesai I wasn't aware about any of that, however after looking it up, wouldn't a Freexian scheme be complicated to implement? 12:44:48
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesai I think there's a difference between specifically collecting money for somebody vs paying out already collected generic f-droid donations 12:45:19
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspdepends on the purpose the money was given for, I think12:46:32
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp(will drop from the discussion for now because of $dayjob)12:46:55
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesaihttps://opencollective.com/f-droid#section-about that is already mentioned here12:47:43
@eighthave:matrix.org_hchow about we move this discussion to be more async on the forum?12:52:00
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesai+112:54:58
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesaiAnother thing that could be relevant are bounties, can discuss more on the forum12:55:57
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.org@freenode_wb9688:matrix.org(And NOT using Bountysource)13:24:41
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesaiwb9688: I just meant the concept in general.13:42:06
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.org@freenode_wb9688:matrix.org I know, I was just mentioning that imho you shouldn't use Bountysource if you want to do bounties 13:44:02
7 Aug 2020
@freenode_izzy:matrix.orgizzy joined the room.08:11:36
@freenode_izzy:matrix.orgizzy just to let you know: I'm AFK for the next 10 days, will be back on August 17/18. 08:11:37
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcenjoy! I will also be largely AFK for the next 10 days, but not entirely09:21:35
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc kitsunyan: if you change the API entrypoint to packages I'd merge your JSON API now. I know packages is not a great term, but it is the one we have. I think its important to reuse the names we have rather than introducing a new, not great name. 13:22:59
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc e.g. apps or applications 13:23:24
@kitsunyan:matrix.orgkitsunyanHi! I saw your reply, but didn't have time for it.13:24:09
@kitsunyan:matrix.orgkitsunyan I'm fine with changing to "packages". 13:24:32
@eighthave:matrix.org_hchave any time to update your merge request?13:24:53
@kitsunyan:matrix.orgkitsunyanYes.13:26:37
@kitsunyan:matrix.orgkitsunyanLet me see.13:26:41
@kitsunyan:matrix.orgkitsunyanDone.13:31:53

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 1