F-Droid Devs

107 Members
F-Droid development discussion only | Use #fdroid:f-droid.org for general, app- and repo-related matters | Meeting every Thursday at 11:30 UTC | This channel is publicly logged at https://view.matrix.org/alias/%23fdroid-dev:f-droid.org22 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
18 Oct 2020
@uniq:matrix.orguniqIt's a bit upsetting to have perfectly fine merges marked as CI failure, just because some integration for a random linux distro fails :/12:23:46
@uniq:matrix.orguniqhttps://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidserver/-/jobs/79644347412:23:51
@freenode_mimi89999:matrix.orgmimi89999The package should migrate to testing today if everything goes fine.12:29:23
@uniq:matrix.orguniq:)13:13:29
@smichel17:matrix.orgsmichel17 _hc/Bubu: Does this seem reasonable for metadata merging + refactoring plans? https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidserver/-/issues/829#note_429820904 20:09:41
@smichel17:matrix.orgsmichel17Also if someone could assign the issue to me, that would be great :)20:09:52
19 Oct 2020
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc wb9688: about the share menu, see fdroidclient!929 10:33:41
@freenode_[gibot]:matrix.org[gibot][client] !929: Improve sharing apps - https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/merge_requests/92910:33:43
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc cdesai: grote ^^ 10:36:09
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.org@freenode_wb9688:matrix.org Don't we have c!929 working in here as well? 10:40:30
@freenode_[gibot]:matrix.org[gibot][client] !929: Improve sharing apps - https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/merge_requests/92910:40:32
@grote:matrix.orggroteI link the idea to use the system share menu and declare on own intent to handle apks so it shows up there.10:41:15
@grote:matrix.orggrote*like10:41:19
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcunfortuately, it looks like Fynn Godot lost interest... but we'll see10:42:19
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc smichel17: reviewed, commented, and assigned the issue to you! 10:47:23
@glennmen:matrix.orgglennmenI have a question about index-v1 json, I can't seem to figure out what the difference is between sig and signer what is used in the client app? both names seem to be used12:15:02
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc glennmen: if my memory serves, <sig> is the weird MD5 custom fingerprint for the signing key 13:20:24
@glennmen:matrix.orgglennmencorrect13:20:59
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc That's still used, see .data.Apk 13:21:39
@glennmen:matrix.orgglennmenso signer (default SHA256) is not being used anywhere? 13:23:13
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc its the canonical fingerprint method for the signing key, e.g. matches the output of keytool 13:23:57
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcdon't think its used in the client, could be elsehwere13:24:07
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc .data.Apk and .data.App are derived directly from _index-v1.json 13:27:53
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcwith a few exceptions13:27:57
@glennmen:matrix.orgglennmen ok thanks, I am trying to change getMostAppropriateSignature() to our own logic 😅 13:29:21
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc glennmen: why do you think you need separate logic from fdroid? 13:55:41
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcthat stuff is complicated, but the aim is to cover all cases13:56:12
@glennmen:matrix.orgglennmenbecause f-droid isn't "smart" enough for our use-case it seems ;) 14:00:41
@glennmen:matrix.orgglennmen*f-droid client14:00:57
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcright, that's why I am asking. I cannot think of a case where different logic is needed, but I think fdroidclient should include support for all reasonable cases14:58:31

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 1