| 12 Jan 2021 |
 _hc | I think really we need to move towards lighter base installs, with some choice like gitlab-ci.yml's image: debian:buster | 19:47:59 |
| _hc | and keep the stretch box as the default | 19:48:18 |
| _hc | that would be less work than trying to make everything work with a new image | 19:48:32 |
|  @freenode_Xavi92:matrix.org joined the room. | 21:29:36 |
 @freenode_izzy:matrix.org | _hc: where should issues about what issue-bot should scan for being filed: with issue-bot or with fdroidserver? | 22:57:03 |
| @freenode_izzy:matrix.org | Background: Flutter being that popular, we should also scan the pubspec.yaml for its dependencies. If there's something like "google_fonts: ^1.1.0", that should ring a bell. | 22:57:55 |
| @freenode_izzy:matrix.org | My library scanner doesn't find all of those because they often don't show up themselves but seem to be compiled into Flutter's *.so binaries. | 22:58:54 |
 mimi89999 | We should really get Dart in Debian. | 23:47:53 |
| 13 Jan 2021 |
 b1rdy_ | mimi89999 Dart? | 00:28:05 |
|  @freenode_kempe:matrix.org left the room. | 00:31:28 |
| @freenode_kempe:matrix.org joined the room. | 00:31:50 |
| mimi89999 | The language for the Flutter framework. | 00:32:37 |
|  jochensp1 joined the room. | 02:51:26 |
| _hc | mimi89999: propose it as a Google Summer of Code project, then a student gets paid to do it. | 07:30:06 |
| _hc | izzy: if its an issue with fdroid scanner, then fdroidserver. If its an issue with the issuebot's own scanning, then issuebot | 07:31:39 |
| _hc | but not a big deal to move them | 07:31:49 |
| _hc | mimi89999: izzy its great to see you two looking into all these possible scanners. I wrote issuebot's scanners to be standalone modules to make it easy for anyone to contribute. so I'd love to help you learn it. | 07:33:48 |
| _hc | I can now write scanner modules in minutes | 07:34:03 |
| _hc | and the setup needed to test them is pretty minimal | 07:34:28 |
| _hc | izzy: thanks for working to get more contributors involved! I think there should be one admin issue per user to make it easy to track. Also, you probably have to nag people to respond | 07:45:33 |
| @freenode_izzy:matrix.org | <should be one admin issue per user> Yes, definitely. I just "pinged" the second one from there to ask if it's OK with them. No need opening an issue and they refuse ;) | 10:53:44 |
| @freenode_izzy:matrix.org | <if its an issue with `fdroid scanner`> that's what I'm not always sure about #D But yeah, if I guessed wrong the issue can always be moved. | 10:54:46 |
| @freenode_izzy:matrix.org | And usually it's something with `fdroid scanner` as it should also run on updates later. The very same things we want to avoid to start with should not "sneak in" later either. | 10:55:42 |
| @freenode_izzy:matrix.org | _hc: thanks for writing all that up – issue-bot is really a big help! | 10:56:16 |
|  apol_ joined the room. | 17:27:32 |
|  est31 left the room. | 21:31:52 |
| est31 joined the room. | 21:32:12 |
| @freenode_Xavi92:matrix.org | I was reading https://wiki.debian.org/AndroidTools and kept wondering about something: if a GPLv2+ app is depending on Google's non-free Android SDK (which is usually, if not always, bundled with Android Studio), is that a violation of the GPLv2+ license? | 22:54:32 |
| 14 Jan 2021 |
| b1rdy_ | Yay, got it running:
https://gitlab.com/nwrkbiz/fdroiddata/-/pipelines/240954260 | 00:09:10 |
| b1rdy_ | Only for mips64el (to avoid timeout) but if one arch works, the others do aswell (: | 00:11:09 |
