F-Droid Devs

123 Members
F-Droid development discussion only | Use #fdroid:f-droid.org for general, app- and repo-related matters | Meeting every Thursday at 11:30 UTC | This channel is publicly logged at https://view.matrix.org/alias/%23fdroid-dev:f-droid.org22 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Apr 2021
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcits ssh only via a onion service09:55:38
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcI'd be happy to handle over maintenance :)09:55:52
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp I'm happy to leave that to others ;) 09:56:57
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcah its the damn "gzip: stdin: not in gzip format" error10:55:01
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcI thought I found them all...10:55:16
@proletarius101:matrix.orgproletarius101 Can you test this mirror too? linsui https://gitlab.com/fdroid/admin/-/issues/214#note_546333438
It's fast for me but not sure how it works at your side
12:24:45
@proletarius101:matrix.orgproletarius101

And https://f-droid.org/repo/?fingerprint=43238D512C1E5EB2D6569F4A3AFBF5523418B82E0A3ED1552770ABB9A9C9CCAB

Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator at support@acge.com to inform them of the time this error occurred, and the actions you performed just before this error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

12:27:02
@proletarius101:matrix.orgproletarius101 Something went wrong? _hc 12:27:39
@rdfg77:kde.org@rdfg77:kde.org
In reply to @proletarius101:matrix.org
Can you test this mirror too? linsui https://gitlab.com/fdroid/admin/-/issues/214#note_546333438
It's fast for me but not sure how it works at your side
Not very fast but enough.
12:41:18
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc proletarius101: that page should be a 404 Not Found anyway 12:58:15
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp_hc: looks like the website is still old (or is the fix still ongoing?)13:18:28
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcyeah, took a while to figure out and I ran the translation updates while I was at it13:19:12
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcthe deploy is running still13:19:21
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspthx13:19:39
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc proletarius101: I set !975 to be merged, since we're starting the 1.13 cycle now 14:04:06
@proletarius101:matrix.orgproletarius101
In reply to @eighthave:matrix.org
proletarius101: I set !975 to be merged, since we're starting the 1.13 cycle now
That's exciting
14:04:29
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcoops c!97514:04:33
@freenode_[gibot]:matrix.org[gibot][client] !975: Extensively use appcompat - https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/merge_requests/97514:04:34
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc proletarius101: I think !962 is ready also, but I have to run. I'll check back on it later today 14:18:34
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcthe "folow system" theme works nicely :)14:18:45
@bifrost:matrix.orgBifrost Bot left the room.16:00:16
@freenode_izzy:matrix.org@freenode_izzy:matrix.org linsui: wow, thanks! Down to 117 MRs (115 in a few minutes). Did you borrow Thor's hammer? :D _o/ 17:32:45
@rdfg77:kde.org@rdfg77:kde.orgAnd it will be less than 100 mext month.😅17:48:33
@rdfg77:kde.org@rdfg77:kde.org* And it will be less than 100 next month.😅17:49:03
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp _hc: could it be that the official build server still uses jarsigner in verify_apk_signature? I'm trying to understand why de.chagemann.regexcrossword is in the DisabledAlgorithm list, still 19:14:32
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcoff the top of my head, I think apksigner should be used over jarsigner everywhere, if the buildserver is using the latest commits19:23:58
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp looks like only if apksigner is set in the config, I guess that is not the case? I'm preparing a patch 19:25:12
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc it should set apksigner in the config dict internally even if it is not set in the config.yml 19:47:39
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochenspyeah, do you have an other idea for de.chagemann.regexcrossword?19:48:50
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp _hc: I guess the current code is fine, but I don't see other ways why the apks would not verify 21:01:41

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 1