| 5 Apr 2021 |
 @SylvieLorxu:matrix.org | Wasn't that command up to 72 hours? Shouldn't it have moved to the next phase now? | 15:45:10 |
 jochensp | the next phase is signing, which is manual | 16:17:41 |
| jochensp | Sylvia: ^ | 16:17:45 |
 proletarius101 | In reply to @freenode_jochensp:matrix.org
the next phase is signing, which is manual Are there substantial review in the signing phrase? Otherwise it might not necessarily be manual? | 16:48:08 |
| jochensp | proletarius101: well, it is manual on a computer not connected to any network | 16:48:36 |
| jochensp | there are plans to automate that step but afaik no one is working on that, currently | 16:49:15 |
| proletarius101 | Hmm, are there any proposals or background info in GitLab? I guess there are people willing to work on it as long as it's wanted | 16:52:14 |
 cdesai | look for hsm signing in the server issues | 16:52:38 |
| proletarius101 | * Hmm, are there any proposals or background info on GitLab? I guess there are people willing to work on it as long as it's wanted | 16:52:41 |
| @SylvieLorxu:matrix.org | Oh uhm... Liberapay seems to have sent me 50 Euros. I guess "auto" gives kinda a lot given the rest all have a specific value set. Not sure how to deal with this exactly o.O | 17:15:07 |
| @SylvieLorxu:matrix.org | Yay apps were built, I am relieved | 20:09:48 |
|  @freenode_FstplttnSchntzl:matrix.org left the room. | 20:37:18 |
| @freenode_FstplttnSchntzl:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:37:29 |
| 6 Apr 2021 |
 _hc | linsui: if you'd like to run more scans, I can give you ssh access to one of our buildserver instances with a full mirror on it. izzy is also using that for scanning. | 07:59:41 |
| _hc | Also, I'd love help implementing more scans in issuebot. | 07:59:42 |
| _hc | I'm happy to help anyone get started. I wrote it so that the scanning modules could be written in any languge | 08:00:06 |
| _hc | any in case it wasn't clear, I agree, we can do a lot more with automated scan | 08:00:42 |
| _hc | Sylvia: I'm happy to see the money getting paid out! | 08:01:26 |
| _hc | jochensp: about merging things in fdroidserver, I was shocked to see that you do not have Developer status there. you should IMHO! either in fdroidserver or for the whole @fdroid group. | 08:03:15 |
| _hc | I guess we don't have any kind of documented procedure beyond just post an admin issue | 08:03:26 |
 @rdfg77:kde.org | In reply to @eighthave:matrix.org
Also, I'd love help implementing more scans in issuebot. If we can implementing all processure Izzy did for every new app in issuebot, it would be convenient. | 08:11:04 |
| _hc | izzy said he'd try out writing a module in PHP, which he uses, so that would be the first step there. | 08:12:14 |
| _hc | linsui: do you do Python at all? | 08:12:26 |
| _hc | that's easiest for issuebot | 08:12:40 |
| @rdfg77:kde.org | But it should be optional. The current issue bot is too noisy. I though that scan can be triggered by a command, e.g. /scan. | 08:13:35 |
| _hc | I don't know, perhaps only the ones built into gitlab.com? issuebot knows nothing about /scan | 08:14:14 |
| _hc | but could be taught to respond to it | 08:14:28 |
| @rdfg77:kde.org | In reply to @eighthave:matrix.org
linsui: do you do Python at all? Yep, I would like to do that when I have more time. | 08:15:17 |
| @rdfg77:kde.org | Maybe I can try to port Izzy's scanner. I don't know how difficult it is. | 08:17:17 |
| @rdfg77:kde.org | But it's pretty easy to perform a binary scan to all apks since only Android SDK is needed. | 08:18:31 |
