F-Droid Devs

91 Members
F-Droid development discussion only | Use #fdroid:f-droid.org for general, app- and repo-related matters | Meeting every Thursday at 11:30 UTC | This channel is publicly logged at https://view.matrix.org/alias/%23fdroid-dev:f-droid.org19 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
17 Jul 2020
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuI don't currently see any reason why fdroidserver should put a CVC>newest available APK into the repo 12:10:03
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuThere might be some reason for that though12:10:17
@bubu:bubu1.euBubu izzy: any idea why we support having that in the index? 12:10:52
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuThis seems like a general pitfall when builds fail.12:11:24
@bubu:bubu1.euBubu wb9688: would you mind opening an fdroidserver issue about this? 12:13:49
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688 Bubu: I'll do that. It doesn't look like NewPipe failed to build though at https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/org.schabi.newpipe/lastbuild_951 but it's somehow not on F-Droid even though a deploy has occured 12:16:10
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688Or am I missing something?12:16:45
@bubu:bubu1.euBububetter log: https://bubu1.eu/fdroid/repo/org.schabi.newpipe_951.log.gz12:17:47
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuno, you're not missing anything12:18:04
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688What even happened then?12:18:14
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuI don't know12:18:18
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuI'll email ciaran12:18:23
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688Thanks12:19:01
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidserver/-/issues/81212:42:43
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688Oh, #fdroid notifies about that of course12:42:57
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688 Bubu: Could it not publishing it be related to reproducible builds? 12:43:22
@bubu:bubu1.euBubu
In reply to @freenode_wb9688:matrix.org
Bubu: Could it not publishing it be related to reproducible builds?
Yes, probably, but I've still no idea where the apk goes missing.
13:03:42
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688Yeah, it also should log that somewhere13:05:39
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688 And F-Droid uses Google's Android SDK + OpenJDK 8? And where do you get that OpenJDK from? 13:08:57
@bubu:bubu1.euBubudebian13:10:00
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuStill stretch I believe :-/13:10:15
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688OK13:11:16
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688 Jessie doesn't have OpenJDK 8 though, only Stretch and Sid have 13:12:22
@freenode_Kanedias[m]:matrix.orgKanedias[m] joined the room.13:29:42
@freenode_Kanedias[m]:matrix.orgKanedias[m]AdoptOpenJDK is pretty standard by now and works on Jessie13:29:43
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688 Bubu: When I compile it using Sid's OpenJDK (same code as Stretch' OpenJDK, but compiled with newer GCC and stuff), I get the same SHA512 as Tobias' unsigned APK. I'm also 100% sure I ran fdroid signatures on a v1-only signed APK 14:25:47
@bubu:bubu1.euBubu

wb9688:

ERROR: JAR signature failed to verify:
tmp/org.schabi.newpipe_951_cb84069.apk
jarsigner: java.lang.SecurityException: SHA-256 digest error for
res/anim-v21/mtrl_bottom_sheet_slide_in.xml

ERROR: ...verification failed - skipping: org.schabi.newpipe_951_cb84069.apk
15:09:10
@bubu:bubu1.euBubuI'm trying to get the apk in question15:10:22
@freenode_wb9688:matrix.orgwb9688 Bubu: Like I said, it's a different APK, what's your full Matrix username? Then I'll DM it there (too lazy to upload somewhere) 15:18:21
@bubu:bubu1.euBubu@bubu:bubu1.eu 15:18:47

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 1