| 25 Nov 2021 |
|  kempe joined the room. | 16:36:43 |
 Izzy | jochensp: afraid I cannot remove that page – that can only be done by removing (disabling) the entire wiki. I could edit it, though, so if you want different content there just let me know (or tell Hans ;) | 18:30:48 |
 jochensp | Izzy: uhm, that's not the wiki we are looking for ;) Check the sidebar of fdroiddata, there is a link to the old wiki | 18:36:51 |
| jochensp | Izzy: I guess it is in inetrations external wiki: https://forum.gitlab.com/t/how-to-add-links-to-left-menu/41264 | 18:38:28 |
| Izzy | OK, found it. Now points to https://gitlab.com/fdroid/wiki/-/wikis/home – that OK? | 19:03:34 |
| jochensp | Izzy: awesome, thx :) | 19:06:21 |
| Izzy | \o/ | 19:06:36 |
 Sylvia | Finally did my first APK test :D | 19:29:00 |
| Sylvia | Izzy: I haven't done much with fdroiddata, if you say it's okay I can press the merge button on Wire :) | 21:15:32 |
| Sylvia | Just a bit scared as this is one of my first merges heh | 21:15:40 |
| Izzy | I wonder if you can, Sylvia – I just tried and it says merge is blocked. Needs a rebase, but the source branch is protected. Of course, as a maintainer I could override that… | 21:20:40 |
| jochensp | it is on automerge already | 21:21:32 |
| 26 Nov 2021 |
|  genofire left the room. | 00:41:56 |
|  mimi89999 left the room. | 05:23:35 |
| mimi89999 joined the room. | 05:24:50 |
| genofire joined the room. | 09:18:55 |
| 27 Nov 2021 |
| mimi89999 left the room. | 02:46:52 |
 proletarius101 | 
Download 2719cb0d-bc49-4534-b658-1892fb5e0d96.png | 04:32:56 |
| proletarius101 | In reply to @proletarius101:matrix.org
sent an image. Health check via cloudflare globally. Looks like f-droid.org and search.f-droid.org have a high rate of timeout | 04:33:50 |
| proletarius101 | FYI the I use our official mirrors for /repo, rather than requesting F-droid.org/repo | 04:34:47 |
| mimi89999 joined the room. | 12:54:50 |
 j.r | Does anybody know what happened to the apps build in the last build cycle? Did they got lost or will they get deployed together with the current cycle? | 23:19:42 |
| 28 Nov 2021 |
| jochensp | j.r: should get deployed in the current cycle | 04:27:42 |
| jochensp | They are in unsigned/, otherwise they would have been rebuild | 04:32:26 |
| proletarius101 | In reply to @_oftc_jochensp:matrix.org
j.r: should get deployed in the current cycle Then we should really continuously build each cycle, without waiting the deployment | 05:07:22 |
| jochensp | proletarius101: what do you mean? | 05:07:58 |
| proletarius101 | In reply to @_oftc_jochensp:matrix.org
proletarius101: what do you mean? Meaning we should always start a new build cycle as soon as the last one finishes | 05:08:47 |
| jochensp | Then we would never deploy | 05:09:07 |
| jochensp | Remember it is a manual process | 05:09:35 |
| proletarius101 | In reply to @_oftc_jochensp:matrix.org
Then we would never deploy Why? We can deploy the last cycle | 05:09:35 |
