F-Droid Devs

126 Members
F-Droid development discussion only | Use #fdroid:f-droid.org for general, app- and repo-related matters | Meeting every Thursday at 11:30 UTC | This channel is publicly logged at https://view.matrix.org/alias/%23fdroid-dev:f-droid.org18 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Apr 2021
@freenode_mimi89999:matrix.orgmimi89999Hello14:41:40
@freenode_mimi89999:matrix.orgmimi89999I missed a bit14:41:45
@freenode_mimi89999:matrix.orgmimi89999What are the issues with sigcopy currently?14:41:58
12 Apr 2021
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp joined the room.01:22:59
@freenode_larjona_:matrix.orglarjona_ joined the room.08:54:46
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc mimi89999: its mostly done, there are just some really random ones 14:14:00
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcwhich are probably not apksigcopier's fault14:14:11
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc FYI, the official production setup is: fdroid update on Debian/buster, fdroid build on Debian/stretch, and fdroid publish on Ubuntu/focal. 14:16:16
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp _hc: re mail: I'm fine with the current setup 14:23:17
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcok, then be aware there might be differences caused by that14:23:43
@freenode_mimi89999:matrix.orgmimi89999 There are 183 comments under https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidserver/-/merge_requests/893 . I'm totally lost now. 14:25:27
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesai I've been following it via the emails 14:27:25
@freenode_mimi89999:matrix.orgmimi89999 Why can't schildbach upgrade Gradle for future builds? 14:29:50
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesai 4.4.1 is what's currently packaged in debian fwiw 14:30:36
@freenode_mimi89999:matrix.orgmimi89999 Can't they use Gradle from the website? 14:32:29
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp(or gradlew-fdroid?)14:33:33
@freenode_mimi89999:matrix.orgmimi89999F-Droid client failed to build: https://monitor.f-droid.org/builds/log/org.fdroid.fdroid/101205014:41:09
@debeule:gnugen.chartectrexInteresting, I had that issue on my buildserver while testing I think 🤔14:57:22
@rdfg77:kde.orglinsuiShould F-Droid Build Status be labeled as NonFreeNet? It only works with f-droid.org "which is impossible, or not easy to replace."16:46:02
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp linsui: why not easy to replace? 16:47:21
@rdfg77:kde.orglinsuiEasy to replace means that "there is a simple configuration option that allows pointing the app to a running instance of an alternative, publicly available, self-hostable, free software server solution."16:49:48
@debeule:gnugen.chartectrexOh, so you want the app to have an option to point to another f-droid server?16:51:26
@rdfg77:kde.orglinsuiMaybe. If I understand correctly, the NonFreeNet AF is about if the network servoce is selfhostable.16:53:39
@rdfg77:kde.orglinsuiAnd can be selected in the app 16:53:56
@rdfg77:kde.orglinsuiSo if an app only works with a specific website, the AF applies even if the wensite is powered by foss.16:55:38
@rdfg77:kde.orglinsuiThis sounds strange...16:55:59
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcanyone could host their own f-droid.org, all the software is free17:28:18
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcI supposed we couldn't guarantee that the hosting companies' stack is 100% free software, but that seems over the top17:28:45
@rdfg77:kde.orglinsuiYep, the problem is that "Replacement requires changes to the app or service. " Currently there is no such option in the app to work with other instance.17:53:37
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcI think that means more like "non-free default with no possible changes"18:07:04

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 1