F-Droid Devs

102 Members
#fdroid-dev F-Droid development discussion only | Use #fdroid:f-droid.org for general, app- and repo-related matters | Meeting every Thursday at 11:30 UTC | This channel is publicly logged at https://matrix.f-droid.org/alias/%23fdroid-dev:f-droid.org16 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
20 May 2021
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org left the room.06:52:04
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org joined the room.06:53:36
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org left the room.07:27:40
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org joined the room.07:30:26
@DzzzzzzR:matrix.orgdazinismSome tech info about how alternative app stores can work smoother in Android 12 08:40:49
@DzzzzzzR:matrix.orgdazinismhttps://www.xda-developers.com/android-12-alternative-app-stores-update-apps-background/08:40:58
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcyeah, its a nice new feature for those who use F-Droid on Google Play devices08:44:18
@eighthave:matrix.org_hconce F-Droid implements it...08:44:29
@eighthave:matrix.org_hchttps://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/-/issues/183608:44:39
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc jochensp: the whole NDK overhaul is a large project, so I'm trying to do it in small steps of useful functionality. If you think that MR breaks something, I'd like to hear it. Otherwise, yeah, I'd like to handle improvements in followups 08:50:09
@freenode_jochensp:matrix.orgjochensp _hc: agreed. I don't see problems but I didn't test it either. Feel free to go ahead. Otherwise I could spin up a test later today if you want my ack 09:01:44
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org left the room.09:06:56
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org joined the room.09:10:17
@eighthave:matrix.org_hc cdesai: FYI I removed you as "direct member" developer from fdroidclient since you are now Developer for the whole fdroid group 09:16:38
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcstrange that gitlab doesn't automatically do that09:16:55
@freenode_ViGe:matrix.org@freenode_ViGe:matrix.org left the room.09:17:24
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesai_hc: re: c!1836 - we could create a new PackageInstaller that used those APIs, have it be optional for now, and ship it early for testing09:21:35
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesai then once it's working ok, make that the default for API > 29? 09:21:45
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org left the room.09:21:54
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org joined the room.09:24:29
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org left the room.09:56:57
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org joined the room.09:57:56
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org left the room.10:12:04
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcyeah, like enabled by an Expert mode switch10:12:08
@debeule:gnugen.chartectrex
In reply to @eighthave:matrix.org
yeah, like enabled by an Expert mode switch
Well, ideally it would be the default after a while, right?
10:13:13
@freenode_cdesai:matrix.orgcdesaiyes10:13:30
@debeule:gnugen.chartectrexSo exciting news for F-Droid, I feel like it's been a while since they did anything good haha10:13:40
@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org@freenode_djBRDF:matrix.org joined the room.10:13:51
@debeule:gnugen.chartectrex(they meaning Google)10:13:54
@eighthave:matrix.org_hcyay for anti-trust pressure! I think the Android devs in general want to do the right thing, its more the bosses that have a different point of view10:14:22

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 1